Free Rubric Templates for Every Subject and Grade Level
Copy-ready rubric templates for grading essays, math problems, lab reports, presentations, and group projects. Each grading rubric template includes complete criteria descriptors across all performance levels. Use our free rubric maker to create custom rubrics instantly.
Rubric Templates
Rubric Types
All Grade Levels
Copy and Use Today
What Is a Rubric Template?
A rubric template is a structured scoring guide that lists the criteria for evaluating student work alongside clear descriptions of performance at each level. Teachers use rubric templates to ensure consistent, transparent, and fair grading across all students and assignments. The best rubric templates include specific, measurable descriptors that remove subjectivity from the assessment process.
Types of Rubric Templates Explained
Understanding the three main rubric types helps you choose the right grading rubric template for your assignment and learning goals.
Holistic Rubric
Assigns a single overall score based on the total quality of student work. Evaluates the assignment as a whole rather than separate parts.
Analytic Rubric
Scores each criterion separately, providing detailed feedback on individual components. Each dimension gets its own rating and descriptor.
Single-Point Rubric
Describes only proficient-level performance. Teachers write personalized comments for areas above and below the standard.
Free Rubric Templates to Copy and Use
Each rubric template below includes complete criteria and performance-level descriptors. Click "Copy Rubric" to copy the full template to your clipboard and paste it into your document or LMS.
Holistic Rubric Template
A holistic rubric template assigns one overall score for the entire piece of work. Best for quick assessments where you evaluate the overall quality rather than individual components.
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (4 pts) | Meets Expectations (3 pts) | Approaching Expectations (2 pts) | Below Expectations (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Performance | Work demonstrates exceptional understanding and mastery of all learning objectives. Student shows original thinking, thorough analysis, and sophisticated application of concepts. The work is polished, well-organized, and goes significantly beyond grade-level expectations with no errors. | Work demonstrates solid understanding of learning objectives. Student applies concepts accurately, organizes ideas effectively, and provides adequate supporting details. The work meets grade-level expectations with only minor errors that do not affect overall quality. | Work demonstrates partial understanding of learning objectives. Student shows some application of concepts but with noticeable gaps in accuracy, organization, or detail. The work is progressing toward grade-level expectations but needs revision in several areas. | Work demonstrates minimal understanding of learning objectives. Student shows limited application of concepts with significant errors, poor organization, or insufficient detail. The work does not yet meet grade-level expectations and requires substantial revision or reteaching. |
Analytic Rubric Template
An analytic rubric template scores each criterion separately, providing detailed feedback on individual components. Best for complex assignments where you want students to understand their strengths and weaknesses in specific areas.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content & Knowledge | Demonstrates thorough, in-depth understanding of the topic. All information is accurate and well-researched. Includes insightful connections and original analysis beyond what was taught. | Demonstrates solid understanding of the topic. Most information is accurate and relevant. Makes appropriate connections between ideas and shows clear comprehension of key concepts. | Demonstrates partial understanding of the topic. Some information is accurate but may include errors or gaps. Connections between ideas are limited or unclear. | Demonstrates minimal understanding of the topic. Information is largely inaccurate, irrelevant, or missing. Little to no evidence of connection between ideas. |
| Organization & Structure | Exceptionally well-organized with a clear, logical flow. Introduction, body, and conclusion are compelling and cohesive. Transitions are smooth and enhance readability. | Well-organized with a clear structure. Introduction, body, and conclusion are present and functional. Transitions are used appropriately between ideas. | Some organizational structure is present but may be inconsistent. Introduction or conclusion may be weak. Few transitions are used, causing choppy flow. | Lacks clear organizational structure. Ideas are presented randomly without logical flow. Missing introduction, conclusion, or both. No transitions used. |
| Communication & Clarity | Ideas are expressed with exceptional clarity and precision. Vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. Sentences are well-constructed with engaging style appropriate for the audience. | Ideas are expressed clearly and understandably. Vocabulary is appropriate and accurate. Sentences are generally well-constructed with a consistent style. | Ideas are sometimes unclear or confusing. Vocabulary is basic or occasionally misused. Some sentences are awkward or incomplete. | Ideas are difficult to understand. Vocabulary is limited or frequently misused. Sentences are incomplete, run-on, or incoherent. |
| Mechanics & Conventions | Virtually no errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or formatting. The work demonstrates a polished command of language conventions that enhances the presentation. | Few minor errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or formatting. Errors do not interfere with readability or understanding of the content. | Several errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or formatting. Some errors interfere with readability or distract from the content. | Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or formatting. Errors significantly impede readability and understanding of the content. |
Single-Point Rubric Template
A single-point rubric template describes only the proficient-level performance. Teachers add personalized feedback for areas that exceed or fall below the standard. Best for encouraging detailed, narrative feedback.
| Criteria | Concerns / Areas for Growth | Proficient (Standard) (3 pts) | Strengths / Exceeds Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content & Ideas | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] | Work demonstrates clear understanding of the topic. Ideas are supported with relevant evidence and examples. Key concepts are addressed accurately and completely. | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] |
| Organization | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] | Work has a clear beginning, middle, and end. Ideas are logically sequenced with appropriate transitions. The structure supports the purpose of the assignment. | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] |
| Language & Conventions | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] | Writing uses grade-appropriate vocabulary and sentence structures. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly correct. The tone and style are appropriate for the assignment. | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] |
| Effort & Process | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] | Student followed the assignment guidelines and met all requirements. Evidence of revision and editing is present. Work was submitted on time and shows genuine effort. | [Teacher writes specific feedback here] |
Writing Rubric Template
A comprehensive writing rubric template covering thesis, evidence, organization, grammar, and format. Use this grading rubric template for essays, research papers, and other written assignments across all grade levels.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis & Focus | Presents a clear, compelling, and original thesis that demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the topic. Maintains sharp focus throughout the entire piece. Every paragraph directly supports the central argument. | Presents a clear thesis that addresses the prompt. Maintains consistent focus throughout most of the piece. Paragraphs generally support the central argument with minor digressions. | Thesis is present but vague or overly broad. Focus wavers in several sections. Some paragraphs drift from the central argument or address tangential topics. | Thesis is missing, unclear, or does not address the prompt. Work lacks focus and direction. Paragraphs do not connect to a central argument or idea. |
| Evidence & Support | Uses abundant, well-chosen evidence from credible sources. Integrates quotes and data seamlessly with thorough analysis. Evidence clearly and convincingly supports every claim. Demonstrates critical evaluation of sources. | Uses sufficient, relevant evidence to support claims. Quotes and data are properly introduced and explained. Most claims are adequately supported with appropriate evidence from the text or sources. | Uses some evidence but it may be insufficient, irrelevant, or poorly integrated. Analysis of evidence is superficial. Several claims lack adequate supporting evidence or reasoning. | Little to no evidence is provided. Claims are unsupported opinions. When evidence is present, it is irrelevant or incorrectly cited. No analysis of evidence is attempted. |
| Organization & Flow | Structure is logical and enhances the argument. Introduction hooks the reader and provides context. Body paragraphs build on each other with sophisticated transitions. Conclusion synthesizes ideas and leaves a lasting impression. | Structure is clear with introduction, body, and conclusion. Paragraphs follow a logical order. Transitions connect ideas between and within paragraphs. The reader can easily follow the progression of ideas. | Some structure is present but inconsistent. Introduction or conclusion may be weak or missing key elements. Transitions are limited or formulaic. The reader sometimes struggles to follow the sequence of ideas. | No clear organizational structure. Introduction and conclusion are missing or ineffective. No transitions between ideas. The reader cannot follow the progression of thought. |
| Grammar & Mechanics | Writing is virtually error-free. Demonstrates command of complex sentence structures, precise word choice, and varied syntax. Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are correct throughout. | Writing contains few errors that do not impede understanding. Sentences are generally well-constructed. Word choice is appropriate. Minor errors in punctuation, spelling, or grammar are present but infrequent. | Writing contains several errors that occasionally impede understanding. Sentences may be awkward, repetitive, or fragments/run-ons. Word choice is sometimes imprecise or informal for the assignment. | Writing contains frequent errors that significantly impede understanding. Sentences are incomplete or incoherent. Word choice is inappropriate or extremely limited. Pervasive spelling and grammar errors. |
| Format & Citations | Follows all formatting requirements precisely. Citations are correctly formatted in the required style (MLA, APA, etc.). Works cited page is complete and accurate. In-text citations are properly used for all borrowed ideas. | Follows most formatting requirements. Citations are generally correct with minor formatting issues. Works cited page is present with most entries correct. In-text citations are used for most borrowed ideas. | Follows some formatting requirements but with noticeable deviations. Citations have several formatting errors. Works cited page is incomplete or has multiple errors. Some borrowed ideas lack proper attribution. | Does not follow formatting requirements. Citations are missing or incorrectly formatted throughout. No works cited page or it is severely incomplete. Borrowed ideas are not properly attributed. |
Math Problem-Solving Rubric
A rubric template for evaluating mathematical problem-solving, including conceptual understanding, strategy selection, computation accuracy, and communication of mathematical reasoning.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptual Understanding | Demonstrates thorough understanding of the mathematical concepts required. Identifies the problem type and all relevant information correctly. Makes meaningful connections to prior knowledge and related mathematical concepts. | Demonstrates solid understanding of the mathematical concepts. Correctly identifies the problem type and most relevant information. Shows appropriate application of learned concepts to the problem. | Demonstrates partial understanding of the concepts. Identifies some relevant information but misses key components. Application of concepts is inconsistent or partially incorrect. | Demonstrates little to no understanding of the mathematical concepts. Cannot identify the problem type or relevant information. Does not apply appropriate mathematical concepts. |
| Problem-Solving Strategy | Selects and executes an efficient, elegant strategy. Shows multiple solution pathways or verifies the answer using an alternative method. Strategy demonstrates sophisticated mathematical reasoning. | Selects and executes an appropriate strategy that leads to a correct solution. The approach is logical and clearly connected to the problem. Shows a complete plan from start to finish. | Selects a strategy that is partially appropriate. The approach has some logic but contains gaps or errors that prevent reaching a correct solution. Shows an incomplete plan. | No clear strategy is evident or the strategy chosen is inappropriate for the problem. Work appears random or shows no logical plan for solving the problem. |
| Computation & Accuracy | All calculations are correct and clearly shown. Labels and units are used accurately throughout. The final answer is correct, complete, and appropriately rounded or simplified. | Most calculations are correct with work shown. Minor computational errors that do not significantly affect the final answer. Labels and units are mostly correct. | Some calculations are correct but there are significant computational errors. Work is partially shown. Labels and units are missing or inconsistent. | Calculations are largely incorrect or missing. Little to no work is shown. The final answer is incorrect or not provided. No labels or units are used. |
| Mathematical Communication | Explanation is clear, complete, and uses precise mathematical vocabulary. Work is neatly organized and easy to follow. Diagrams, models, or representations are used effectively to support reasoning. | Explanation is understandable and uses some mathematical vocabulary. Work is organized and can be followed. Some use of diagrams or representations to support reasoning. | Explanation is vague or incomplete. Limited use of mathematical vocabulary. Work is somewhat disorganized and difficult to follow in places. | No explanation provided or explanation does not relate to the problem. No mathematical vocabulary used. Work is disorganized and cannot be followed. |
Science Lab Report Rubric
A rubric template for evaluating science lab reports, covering hypothesis formation, experimental procedure, data collection, analysis, and scientific communication.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis & Research Question | Hypothesis is clearly stated in if/then format, is testable, and demonstrates deep understanding of the scientific concept. Background research is thorough and directly informs the hypothesis. Research question is specific and focused. | Hypothesis is stated in if/then format and is testable. Some background research supports the prediction. Research question is clear and related to the investigation. | Hypothesis is present but may not be in proper format or may not be fully testable. Limited background research. Research question is vague or overly broad. | Hypothesis is missing, not testable, or is simply a guess without scientific reasoning. No background research. Research question is missing or unrelated to the experiment. |
| Experimental Procedure | Procedure is detailed enough for exact replication. Variables (independent, dependent, controlled) are clearly identified and controlled. Steps are sequential, numbered, and include specific measurements. Safety precautions are noted. | Procedure is clear and could be mostly replicated. Variables are identified. Steps are in logical order with sufficient detail. Basic safety considerations are mentioned. | Procedure is present but lacks detail for full replication. Some variables are identified. Steps may be out of order or missing important details. | Procedure is missing, incomplete, or impossible to follow. Variables are not identified. Steps are vague, unlisted, or missing entirely. |
| Data Collection & Presentation | Data is thorough, accurate, and well-organized in clearly labeled tables and/or graphs. Appropriate graph type is used with correct axes, labels, units, and title. Multiple trials are included. Raw data and processed data are both presented. | Data is organized in tables and/or graphs with labels. Graph type is appropriate with most elements correct. Sufficient data is collected. Data presentation is clear and readable. | Some data is presented but may be incomplete or poorly organized. Graphs or tables may be missing labels, titles, or units. Limited data collected. | Data is missing, inaccurate, or presented without any organization. No graphs or tables. Insufficient data collected for meaningful analysis. |
| Analysis & Conclusion | Analysis thoroughly explains results using scientific reasoning. Conclusion directly addresses the hypothesis with specific data references. Sources of error are identified with suggestions for improvement. Connections to real-world applications or further research are made. | Analysis explains results with some scientific reasoning. Conclusion addresses whether the hypothesis was supported or rejected. Some sources of error are identified. Basic connections to broader concepts are made. | Analysis is superficial and restates data without explanation. Conclusion may not clearly connect to the hypothesis. Limited or no discussion of error sources. Few connections to broader concepts. | Analysis is missing or does not relate to the data. Conclusion is missing or does not address the hypothesis. No discussion of errors or limitations. No connections made to scientific concepts. |
Presentation & Oral Rubric
A rubric template for evaluating oral presentations, speeches, and classroom presentations. Covers content delivery, visual aids, audience engagement, and speaking skills.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content & Preparation | Presentation content is thorough, accurate, and well-researched. Key points are clearly defined and supported with relevant examples, data, or anecdotes. Demonstrates expertise and deep understanding of the topic. Content goes beyond basic requirements. | Content is accurate and covers the topic adequately. Key points are identified and supported. Demonstrates solid understanding of the material. Content meets all assignment requirements. | Content is partially accurate or incomplete. Some key points are missing or unsupported. Demonstrates surface-level understanding. Content partially meets assignment requirements. | Content is inaccurate, off-topic, or severely lacking. Key points are not identified. Demonstrates little understanding of the topic. Content does not meet assignment requirements. |
| Delivery & Speaking Skills | Speaks clearly with excellent volume, pace, and expression. Maintains consistent eye contact with the audience. Uses natural gestures and body language that enhance the message. Speaks confidently without relying on notes. | Speaks clearly with appropriate volume and pace. Makes frequent eye contact with the audience. Uses some gestures and appropriate body language. Refers to notes occasionally but does not read from them. | Speaking is sometimes unclear, too quiet, or too fast. Eye contact is inconsistent. Limited use of gestures or body language. Relies heavily on notes or reads from slides. | Speaking is difficult to hear or understand. Little to no eye contact with the audience. No gestures or distracting body language. Reads entirely from notes, slides, or script. |
| Visual Aids & Slides | Visual aids are professional, creative, and enhance understanding. Slides are visually appealing with appropriate text, images, and design. Graphics and charts effectively illustrate key points. Multimedia elements are well-integrated. | Visual aids support the presentation and are clear. Slides have a reasonable amount of text and relevant images. Design is clean and readable. Visual aids serve their purpose effectively. | Visual aids are present but may be cluttered, hard to read, or only loosely connected to the content. Slides may have too much text or poor design choices. | Visual aids are missing, irrelevant, or detract from the presentation. Slides are unreadable, poorly designed, or contain errors. No effort to create supporting materials. |
| Audience Engagement | Actively engages the audience throughout with questions, interaction, or compelling storytelling. Responds thoughtfully to audience questions. Adapts presentation based on audience reactions. The audience is clearly attentive and interested. | Makes efforts to engage the audience at several points. Responds to audience questions adequately. Maintains audience attention for most of the presentation. | Limited attempts to engage the audience. Struggles to respond to questions. Audience attention wanders during parts of the presentation. | No attempt to engage the audience. Cannot answer questions about the topic. Audience is clearly disengaged or confused throughout. |
Group Project Rubric
A rubric template for evaluating group projects, including individual contributions, collaboration quality, final product, and presentation. Helps ensure fair assessment of both the group and individual effort.
| Criteria | Exceeds (4) (4 pts) | Meets (3) (3 pts) | Approaching (2) (2 pts) | Below (1) (1 pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual Contribution | Consistently goes above and beyond assigned responsibilities. Takes initiative to complete additional tasks and help other group members. Work quality is exceptional and submitted on time. Demonstrates leadership and accountability throughout the project. | Completes all assigned responsibilities on time and at a satisfactory quality. Participates actively in group meetings and discussions. Takes ownership of their portion of the work. | Completes most assigned responsibilities but may need reminders. Quality of work is inconsistent. Participation in group meetings is sporadic. Relies on others to complete shared tasks. | Fails to complete assigned responsibilities or completes them late. Work quality is poor. Rarely participates in group meetings. Does not contribute fair share to the project. |
| Collaboration & Teamwork | Actively listens to and values all group members' ideas. Helps resolve conflicts constructively and builds consensus. Encourages participation from quieter members. Creates a positive, productive group dynamic. | Works cooperatively with group members. Listens to others' ideas and offers constructive feedback. Participates in group decision-making. Maintains a respectful and positive attitude. | Sometimes works cooperatively but may dominate discussions or disengage. Listening and feedback skills are inconsistent. May cause minor conflicts within the group. | Does not work cooperatively with group members. Dismisses others' ideas or refuses to compromise. Creates conflict or tension within the group. Does not participate in decision-making. |
| Final Product Quality | Final product is polished, creative, and exceeds all assignment requirements. Demonstrates cohesive integration of all group members' contributions. Shows evidence of thorough revision and attention to detail. | Final product meets all assignment requirements. Group members' contributions are integrated effectively. The product is complete, organized, and presentable. | Final product meets some requirements but is incomplete in areas. Contributions feel disconnected or inconsistent in quality. Some revision is needed. | Final product is incomplete or does not meet assignment requirements. Contributions are not integrated. The product appears rushed with little revision or quality control. |
| Time Management & Process | Group created and followed a detailed timeline with milestones. All deadlines were met ahead of schedule. Regular check-ins ensured quality throughout the process. The group adapted plans proactively when challenges arose. | Group created a timeline and mostly followed it. Final deadline was met. Regular progress was made throughout the project period. Minor adjustments were made when needed. | Group had a loose plan but struggled to follow it. Work was primarily completed near the deadline. Progress was inconsistent throughout the project period. | No planning or timeline was created. Work was done entirely at the last minute. Deadline was missed or the product was submitted incomplete due to poor time management. |
How to Create a Rubric Template
Follow these seven steps to build a clear, effective rubric for any assignment. Or use our free rubric maker to generate one instantly with AI.
Identify Learning Objectives
Start with the specific learning objectives or standards your assignment targets. What should students know or be able to do by the end? Write these as clear, measurable outcomes that will form the foundation of your rubric criteria.
Define the Criteria
Break your learning objectives into 3-6 specific, observable criteria. Each criterion should focus on a distinct aspect of the assignment (e.g., content accuracy, organization, creativity). Make sure criteria are independent and do not overlap.
Choose a Rubric Type
Select holistic (single overall score), analytic (separate scores per criterion), or single-point (proficient-level descriptors with open feedback). Choose based on your purpose: quick grading (holistic), detailed feedback (analytic), or narrative feedback (single-point).
Write Performance Level Descriptors
For each criterion, write clear descriptions of what student work looks like at each performance level. Start with the proficient level, then describe what exceeding and falling below looks like. Use specific, observable language rather than vague terms.
Assign Point Values
Decide on your scoring scale (typically 4-point) and assign point values to each level. Consider whether all criteria should be weighted equally or if some are more important. Calculate the total possible points and determine how scores convert to grades.
Test and Refine
Before using the rubric with students, test it by scoring 2-3 sample pieces of work. Check that the descriptors clearly distinguish between performance levels and that the rubric produces fair, consistent scores. Revise any ambiguous language.
Share with Students
Distribute the rubric to students before they begin the assignment. Walk through each criterion and performance level, showing exemplars when possible. Encourage students to use the rubric for self-assessment during their work process.
Rubric Templates by Subject
Key criteria to include in your rubric template for each core subject area. Use these as starting points when building your own grading rubric templates.
Mathematics
- Problem-solving strategy
- Computational accuracy
- Mathematical reasoning
- Use of models and representations
- Mathematical vocabulary
English Language Arts
- Thesis and argument development
- Textual evidence and analysis
- Organization and structure
- Grammar and conventions
- Voice and style
Science
- Scientific inquiry and method
- Data collection and analysis
- Use of scientific vocabulary
- Lab safety and procedures
- Evidence-based conclusions
Social Studies
- Historical analysis and context
- Use of primary/secondary sources
- Geographic reasoning
- Civic understanding
- Research and argumentation
Art & Creative
- Creativity and originality
- Technical skill and craftsmanship
- Use of elements and principles
- Artistic process and reflection
- Presentation and effort
Why Use a Rubric Template for Grading?
Research consistently shows that rubrics improve both teaching and learning outcomes. Here is why every teacher should use rubric templates.
Consistent and Fair Grading
Rubrics eliminate guesswork and ensure every student is evaluated against the same clear standards. This reduces grading bias and increases fairness, especially when multiple teachers or sections are involved.
Saves Grading Time
Rather than writing lengthy comments from scratch, rubric templates let you quickly identify where each student falls on the performance scale. Teachers report saving 30-50% of grading time when using rubrics.
Clear Expectations for Students
When students receive the rubric before starting an assignment, they understand exactly what quality work looks like. This transparency leads to higher quality submissions and fewer disputes about grades.
Meaningful Feedback
Rubrics provide specific, actionable feedback that tells students exactly what they did well and where they need to improve. This is far more useful than a letter grade alone and supports student growth.
Supports Self-Assessment
Students can use rubric templates to evaluate their own work before submission, developing critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Peer review with rubrics also builds collaborative learning.
Aligns Assessment with Standards
Rubrics ensure your grading directly maps to learning objectives and standards. This alignment helps with curriculum planning, progress monitoring, and communicating student achievement to parents.
Need a Custom Rubric Template?
These free rubric templates are a great starting point, but every assignment is unique. Our AI rubric generator creates custom grading rubrics tailored to your specific assignment, subject, grade level, and standards in seconds.
Create Custom Rubric FreeFree to use -- No credit card required -- Instant results
Rubric Template FAQs
Related Assessment Resources
Explore more assessment tools and free teacher resources to streamline your grading workflow.
AI Rubric Generator
Create custom rubrics for any assignment with our free rubric maker powered by AI.
Assessment Generator
Generate multiple-choice assessments aligned to your standards and learning objectives.
Student Work Feedback
Generate detailed, constructive feedback on student submissions in seconds.
Free Lesson Plan Templates
Ready-to-use lesson plan templates for every subject and grade level.
Report Card Comments
200+ free report card comments organized by subject and grade level.
IEP Goal Examples
200+ SMART IEP goals for reading, math, behavior, and social-emotional learning.
Stop grading on Sundays.
Reclaim your weekends. Generate lesson plans, grading feedback, and resources in seconds. Your time belongs to you, not your paperwork.
Join 10,000+ teachers saving 10+ hours every week